Home
  Search
  JSE at Wiley-Blackwell

 Journal

Accepted Articles

Early View

Current Issue

Archive

 
  Manuscript Submission

Online Submission

Instructions for Authors

Copyright Transfer Agreement


 About JSE

Aims & Scope

Editorial Board

Online Office

Sponsors & Publisher


 Partner Journals

Other Journals from IB-CAS

TAXON

Plant Diversity and Resources

Journal of Systematics and Evolution

Volume 56 Issue 1, Pages 35C47.

Published Online: 26 Sept. 2017

DOI: 10.1111/jse.12276

References
Full Text HTML
Full Text PDF
Print this page
Towards resolving the evolutionary history of Caucasian pears (Pyrus, Rosaceae)!Phylogenetic relationships, divergence times and leaf trait evolution

Nadja Korotkova1*, Gerald Parolly1, Anahit Khachatryan2, Lusine Ghulikyan3, Harutyun Sargsyan4, Janna Akopian2, Thomas Borsch1,5, and Michael Gruenstaeudl5

1Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Strasse 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany

2Armen L. Takhtajan Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia

3L. A. Orbeli Institute of Physiology, National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia

4Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia

5Institut f┨r Biologie, Systematische Botanik und Pflanzengeographie, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany

Keywords: Caucasus; Europe; leaf shape; morphological characters; paleogeography; phylogeny; taxonomy

Abstract:

With approximately 25 endemic species, the genus Pyrus (pears) is highly diverse in the Caucasus ecoregion. The majority of Caucasian pears inhabit xerophytic open woodlands or similar habitats, to which they display morphological adaptations, such as narrow leaves. The other species, both Caucasian and non-Caucasian taxa, mainly inhabit mesophytic forests and display broad leaves. Using a representative taxon sampling of Pyrus from the Caucasus, Europe and Asia, we reconstruct phylogenetic relationships in the genus based on multiple plastid regions. We also estimate the divergence times of major clades in Pyrus, reconstruct the evolution of leaf shapes, and discuss the emergence of xeromorphic leaf traits. Our results confirm the monophyly of Pyrus and the existence of two major clades: (a) an E Asian clade with a crown group age of 15.7 (24.02–8.37 95% HPD) My, and (b) a W Eurasian clade that comprises species from Europe, SW Asia and the Caucasus and that displays a slightly younger crown group of 12.38 (19.02–6.41 95% HPD) My. The existing infrageneric classification of Pyrus was found partially incongruent with the inferred phylogenetic trees. Several currently accepted species were not recovered as monophyletic, indicating that current species limits require re-evaluation. Ancestral character state reconstructions revealed several independent transitions from broad- to narrow-shaped leaves in Pyrus, probably via intermediate-shaped leaves.

 

Copyright © 2017. The Editorial Office, Journal of Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Botany, CAS
No. 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel.: +86 10 62836132; 62836572    Fax:+86 10 62836132
E-mail: jse@ibcas.ac.cn
利嫋姥宛催詐ICP姥16067583催-32