JSE at Wiley-Blackwell


Accepted Articles

Early View

Current Issue


  Manuscript Submission

Online Submission

Instructions for Authors

Copyright Transfer Agreement

 About JSE

Aims & Scope

Editorial Board

Online Office

Sponsors & Publisher

 Partner Journals

Other Journals from IB-CAS


Plant Diversity and Resources

Journal of Systematics and Evolution

Volume 56 Issue 1, Pages 48C55.

Published Online: 16 Nov. 2017

DOI: 10.1111/jse.12285

Full Text HTML
Full Text PDF
Print this page
Phylogenetic placement of Yunnanopilia (Opiliaceae) inferred from molecular and morphological data

Liu Yang, Guan-Song Yang, Hai-Ying Ma, Yue-Hua Wang*, and Shi-Kang Shen*

School of Life Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China

Keywords: molecular phylogeny; monotypic genus; morphological analysis; phylogenetic placement; Yunnanopilia longistaminea


Yunnanopilia longistaminea (W.Z. Li) C.Y. Wu & D.Z. Li, which is a controversial species in Opiliaceae, is treated as a variety of Champereia manillana (Blume) Merrill in the Flora of China and morphological analysis has produced conflicting results regarding its affinity to Melientha and Champereia. To determine the systematic position of Yunnanopilia in Opiliaceae, we selected two nuclear regions (internal transcribed spacer [ITS4-ITS5] and 18S rDNA) and four chloroplast regions (rbcL, matK, psbA-trnH, and trnS-trnG) to test the phylogenetics of the family Opiliaceae using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analysis. Morphological characteristics were also examined to clarify the similarities and differences among Y. longistaminea and two closely related species. Agonandra was located at the basal position in the family Opiliaceae; in the large clade including other remaining genera, two main clades were clearly identified and correlated with inflorescence morphological characteristics. All samples of Y. longistaminea formed a clade. Yunnanopilia, Melientha, and Champereia were more closely related than other genera of Opiliaceae. Yunnanopilia longistaminea was sister to M. suavis Pierre and was more closely related to M. suavis than to C. manillana. Morphological analysis also showed that differences in the inflorescences and flowers between Y. longistaminea and M. suavis were substantial enough to warrant the retention of Y. longistaminea in its current genus. Thus, we suggest that the monotypic Yunnanopilia be treated as a distinct genus and that the name Y. longistaminea should be adopted.


Copyright © 2017. The Editorial Office, Journal of Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Botany, CAS
No. 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel.: +86 10 62836132; 62836572    Fax:+86 10 62836132
E-mail: jse@ibcas.ac.cn