J Syst Evol ›› 2010, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 36-46.DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00063.x

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of ten plant barcodes in Bryophyta (Mosses)

1, 2Yan LIU 3Hai-Fei YAN 4Tong CAO* 3Xue-Jun GE*   

  1. 1 (Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China)
    2 (Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
    3 (Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China)
    4 (College of Life & Environment Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)
  • Received:2009-07-16 Published:2010-01-18

Abstract: DNA barcoding is a molecular tool that uses a standardized DNA region to identify species. Our preliminary study reported here is the first attempt to specifically focus on universality and attributes of candidate barcodes across a wide systematic range of mosses. We tested eight previously proposed plant barcoding regions (atpF-atpH, ITS2, matK, psbK-psbI, rbcL, rpoB, rpoC1, trnH-psbA) and two popular phylogenetic markers (rps4 and trnL-trnF of cpDNA) in 49 moss species and 9 liverwort species, representing half of the orders in moss lineages. The ITS2, rbcL, rpoC1, rps4, trnH-psbA and trnL-trnF regions showed good universality, and therefore the efficacy of these loci as DNA barcodes was further evaluated in 36 mosses and 2 liverworts, each of which included two to three individuals per taxa. The five loci, viz. rbcL, rpoC1, rps4, trnH-psbA and trnL-trnF, were easy to amplify and sequence and showed significant interspecific genetic variability, making them potentially useful DNA barcodes for mosses. The best performing single loci were the rbcL and rpoC1 coding regions. Several loci showed equivalent performance and combinations of them did not greatly increase their discrimination capacity. In addition, phylogenies generated from each of the separate regions and multi-locus combinations by using best-fit and Kimura 2-parameter models were compared, but no significant difference was found.

Key words: Bryophyta, DNA barcoding, rbcL , rpoC1 , rps4 , trnH-psbA , trnL-trnF .