Interspecific and intergeneric relationships of Prunus s.l. are still unclear due to low levels of genetic variation among species, and resulting partially unresolved phylogenetic inferences. Here we sequenced and compared six complete plastomes from two subgenera of Prunus in order to choose molecular markers to increase the amount of genetic variation suitable for inference of Prunus phylogeny. The plastomes range between 157 817 and 158 995 bp in length, and we found different levels of inverted repeat (IR) contraction among the three sampled subgenera of Prunus s.l. Most regions in Prunus plastomes considered individually provide low phylogenetic resolution at the subgenus or species level compared to a tree constructed using all 78 coding regions combined. We compared levels of variation among 206 coding regions and noncoding (intergenic and intron) plastid regions and inferred phylogenies from each region considered individually. We then chose using two regions together for future studies of relationships in Prunus, ycf1 and trnT-L, that display high to moderate levels of variation among coding and intergenic regions, respectively, and that individually permit inference of resolved species-level trees in Prunus with moderate to strong branch support. Considered together, these two regions allow inference of the same topology of Prunus inferred using all coding plastid regions combined, with comparable levels of tree support to the full plastome set. These two loci should therefore be useful as a plastid phylogenetic marker set for further inference of relationships within Prunus s.l.
In this study, we review the classification of two species, Elymus hispanicus and E. marginatus, which are restricted to highly valuable and sensitive Mediterranean ecosystems. The genomic composition of the two species is analysed by in situ hybridization. In addition, lodicule morphology and foliar anatomy of both species are compared with those of E. caninus, E. repens, E. sibiricus (i.e., the type species of Elymus s.s.) and Pseudoroegneria strigosa (i.e., the type species of Pseudoroegneria). The genomic formula 2n = 8x = 56; HStStSt is proposed for E. hispanicus and 2n = 4x = 28; StSt for E. marginatus. In this latter species, the absence of the ribosomal genes in one of the two St genomes suggests that diploidization may have occurred during the evolution the species. Regarding foliar anatomy, E. hispanicus, E. caninus, E. repens, and E. sibiricus shared several characteristics, but the leaf blades of E. marginatus proved anatomically more similar to those of Ps. strigosa. The data compiled support the contention that: (1) E. hispanicus belongs to Elymus s.s.; (2) E. marginatus should be transferred to Pseudoroegneria; and (3) the morphology of the lodicules should be carefully reconsidered for appropriately describing the boundaries between Elymus s.s. and Pseudoroegneria. The new combination Ps. marginata is proposed and a detailed iconography of the plant is provided.
Forty-five populations of Pentanema corresponding to seven species included in the Pentanema conyzae clade have been studied using AFLP fingerprinting. The results show that allopolyploidization could have been involved in the diversification of this group, specifically in species P. langeanum and P. maletii. Molecular data confirm the presence of P. britannicum in the Iberian Peninsula and key steps are provided to identify the species that are morphologically the most challenging.
Weedy rice (WR, Oryza sativa L. f. spontanea) is a noxious agricultural weed, infesting rice fields worldwide and causing tremendous yield losses of cultivated rice. However, little is known about the relationship between genetic diversity and distribution of WR populations across a wide latitudinal gradient, in addition to its reasons for genetic differentiation. To determine the distribution of genetic diversity and differentiation, we analyzed 20 WR populations collected from wide geographic ranges of rice-planting regions across Northeast, Jiangsu and Guangdong provinces of China, and Sri Lanka, based on 20 simple sequence repeat loci. Our results indicated a significant negative correlation (R = 0.84, P < 0.01) between genetic diversity and latitudinal locations of WR populations. The Mantel test (R2 = 0.49, P < 0.01) showed distinct groupings of WR populations from different rice-planting regions, fitting an isolation-by-distance pattern. In addition, the STRUCTURE analysis and principal coordinates (PCoA) analysis indicated considerable genetic differentiation of WR from different rice-planting regions, which was associated with the types of co-occurring rice cultivars. We conclude based on the above results that WR genetic diversity is affected by the latitudes where WR populations are located. The genetic differentiation of WR populations is determined by their spatial distances and co-occurring rice cultivars. Such a pattern of genetic diversity and differentiation across different regions may facilitate the design of effective WR control, in addition to understanding adaptive evolution of this weed.
The Journal of Systematics and Evolution would like to acknowledge and thank the following reviewers for their contributions in the period January 1–December 31 in 2018:
Alexander, Jason
Álvarez Fernández, Inés
Appelhans, Marc
Assadi, Mostafa
Barkman, Todd
Bauret, Lucie
Bayer, Randall J
Bell, Charles
Bergholz, Kolja
Bernardello, Gabriel
Bippus, Alex
Blackmore, Stephen
Bocksberger, Gaelle
Boufford, David E.
Bruneau, Anne
Cai, Xing‐Xing
Cevallos, Sergio
Chen, Zhi‐Duan
Clement, Wendy
Cohen, James
Comes, Peter
Crayn, Darren
Crespo, Manuel B.
Da Cunha, Maura
De‐Nova, J.
Deng, Yun‐Fei
Dong, Shi‐Yong
Dong, Wen‐Pan
Duan, Yuan‐Wen
Estrada‐Ruiz, Emilio
Fan, Xing
Fatoretto, Julio
Feldberg, Kathrin
Feliner, Gonzalo
Fiaschi, Pedro
Freire, Susana
Freyman, Will
Gao, Lian‐Ming
Garnatje, Teresa
German, Dmitry A.
Gernandt, David
Gerrath, Jean
Gillespie, Emily
Gong, Xun
Graham, Alan
Grote, Paul
Gu, Hong‐Ya
Gu, Xingyou
Guo, Yan‐Ping
Guo, Zhen‐Hua
Harbert, Robert
Harris, AJ
Hartman, Ronald
Hearn, David
Herrera, Fabiany
Hodel, Richard
Hu, Zhong‐Li
Huang, Jian
Huang, Jin‐Ling
Huang, Shuang‐Quan
Ickert‐Bond, Stefanie
Jha, Sumita
Jimenez, Pedro
Jin, Jian‐Hua
Jin, Xiao‐Hua
John, MacDougal
Johnson, Leigh
Jud, Nathan
Kazempour‐Osaloo, Shahrokh
Keeley, Sterling
Keppel, Gunnar
Kikvidze, Zaal
Kilian, Norbert
Kim, Ki‐Joong
Kong, Hang‐Hui
Kunzmann, Lutz
Kwembeya, Ezekiel G.
Li, Hong‐Tao
Li, Huang
Li, Jianhua
Li, Lin‐Feng
Li, Rong
Li, Zhong‐Hu
Liang, Liang
Liao, Wan‐Jin
Liu, Jian‐Quan
Liu, Jie
Liu, Xiao‐Yan
Lombardi, Julio Antonio
Lu, Li‐Min
Lu, Zhi‐Qiang
Ma, Jian‐Chao
Ma, Xiao
Ma, Xiao‐Fei
Manchester, Steven
Mao, Kang‐Shan
Marhold, Karol
Maurin, Olivier
McAllister, Hugh
Metzgar, Jordan
Meyer, Herbert
Michael, Möller
Michelangeli, Fabian A.
Mishler, Brent
Momohara, Arata
Morales‐Briones, Diego F.
Morrone, Juan José
Nakajima, Jimi
Nauheimer, Lars
Nie, Ze‐Long
Nowak, Michael
Olsen, Kenneth M.
Ornelas, Juan Francisco
Patel, Nikisha
Paun, Ovidiu
Peralta, Denilson F.
Pirie, Michael
Qi, Zhe‐Chen
Qiang, Sheng
Qiu, Ying‐Xiong
Ran, Jin‐Hua
Reagon, Micheal
Reginato, Marcelo
Rojas‐Andrés, Blanca
Rong, Jun
Rubin, Matthew J.
Salazar‐Mendias, Carlos
Salino, Alexandre
Sanchez‐Puerta, Virginia
Scherson, Rosa
Schwarz Taylor, Erika
Sessa, Emily
Shan, Hong‐Yan
Shi, Gong‐Le
Shi, Su‐Hua
Simpson, Michael
Soejima, Akiko
Song, Bao‐Hua
Spalink, Daniel
Španiel, Stanislav
Stevens, Peter
Stone, Robert
Strijk, Joeri
Su, Tao
Su, Xu
Sun, Bai‐Nian
Sun, Hai‐Qin
Sun, Hang
Sun, Yan‐Xia
Tank, David
Thomas, Daniel
Tomescu, Alexandru
Uncu, Ayse
Vargas, Pablo
Vatanparast, Mohammad
Vorontsova, Maria S.
Wang, Hong‐Fang
Wang, Jian‐Bo
Wang, Wei
Wen, Jun
Wheeler, Elisabeth
Wilson, Barbara
Wilson, Peter
Wolfe, Andrea
Xia, Hui
Xiao, Sha
Xie, Lei
Yan, Yue‐Hong
Yang, Chun‐Feng
Yang, Shi‐Xiong
Yang, Yong‐Ping
Yu, Wen‐Bin
Yu, Yan
Yue, Ji‐Pei
Zarco, Carlos Romero
Zhang, Jian
Zhang, Ti‐Cao
Zhang, Wenheng
Zhang, Wen‐Ju
Zhao, Gui‐Fang
Zhao, Ting‐Ting
Zhou, Ren‐Chao
Zhou, Shi‐Liang
Zhou, Yong‐Hong
Zhou, Yong‐Feng
Zhou, Zhe‐Kun
Zhou, Zhuo
Zimmer, Elizabeth