J Syst Evol ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (2): 187-204.DOI: 10.1111/jse.13159

• Research Article •     Next Articles

A deep dive into bryophyte genome space reveals opposing evolutionary trends in the sister lineages, mosses and liverworts

Tao Fujiwara1,2*, Hong‐Mei Liu2, Rui‐Liang Zhu3, and Harald Schneider2*   

  1. 1The Mt. Fuji Institute for Nature and Biology, Showa University, Kamiyoshida 4562, Fujiyoshida, Yamanashi 4030005, Japan
    2Center for Integrative Conservation & Yunnan Key Laboratory for Conservation of Tropical Rainforests and Asian Elephants, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Mengla 666303, China
    3Bryology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

    *Authors for correspondence. Tao Fujiwara. E‐mail: tao.fujiwara@gmail.com; Harald Schneider. E‐mail: harald@xtbg.ac.cn
  • Received:2024-02-22 Accepted:2024-11-28 Online:2025-01-27 Published:2025-03-01
  • Supported by:
    The research was financially supported by the postdoctoral fellowships granted to T.F. by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2019PB0148), the post‐doctoral orientation training in Yunnan Province (Y7YN021B13), the Talent Program (G2023038007L), the Yunnan Revitalisation Talent Support Program "Innovation Team" Project (202405AS350019), and the 14th Five‐Year Plan of the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (E3ZKFF8B01).

Abstract: Among the lineages of the tree of life, land plants exhibit a remarkably high genomic disparity because of their distinct evolutionary trajectories in the phylogenetic history of their major lineages. The macroevolutionary pattern of genomic evolution has been mainly investigated to obtain insights into well-studied lineages such as angiosperms, but little attention has been given to many important lineages such as bryophytes. This study was designed to resolve this gap by comparing the genomic evolution trajectories of mosses and liverworts. Thus, a data set comprising chromosome number and genome size was compiled, including previously published and newly generated data that were used to trace the phylogenetic history of these two parameters among mosses and liverworts via ancestral state reconstruction and phylogenetic comparative analyses. Contrasting patterns of chromosome number and genome size evolutions were detected between the two sister lineages. Mosses accumulated high chromosome number disparity via repeated whole-genome duplications and descending dysploidy but maintained a small genome size. By contrast, the chromosome number of liverworts was highly conserved, and heterogeneous trends in genome size evolution were identified among major lineages. These contrasting patterns may be partly explained by the difference in genomic dynamics: Active dynamics enables genome downsizing and reorganization in mosses, whereas genome stability leads to the accumulation of large genomes in liverworts. The results of this study confirmed the distinct trends of genomic evolution in bryophytes.

Key words: bryophytes, chromosome number, diploidization, dysploidy, genome size, macroevolution, polyploidy, whole genome duplication.